Operations workspace

Know what needs attention—and what happens next.

Back to demo leads

Robin Hayes

Proposal

Palm Property Partners · captured 6d ago

Email

robin@palmproperty.example

Phone

760-555-0199

Inquiry for

My business or organization

Preferred contact

Phone

Source

Referral from Coachella Valley business luncheon

Captured

Aug 15, 10:53 PM

Inquiry

Consolidate buyer and seller inquiries and enforce consistent follow-up

Current state: Four agents receive roughly 260 monthly inquiries from the brokerage website, Zillow, open houses, referrals, and direct email. Each agent tracks follow-up differently. Business impact: Duplicate outreach frustrates prospects, while other leads receive no response after the first conversation. Management cannot see source-level conversion or pending next steps. Desired outcome: Create one lead record, identify buyer versus seller intent, assign by territory and price range, and maintain a visible follow-up cadence until the prospect replies, books, or opts out.

Timeline: Within 90 daysBudget: $15,000+Role: Managing partner

AI relationship brief

Understand the person, intent, and next best action

Lead type

Business Inquiry

Persona

Managing partner

Intent

Consolidate buyer and seller inquiries and enforce consistent follow-up

Confidence

94%

Context module

Business

Communication style

Practical and consultative

Next best action

Review the proposed phased scope with the broker: begin with website and open-house leads, validate adoption for 30 days, then add paid portal sources.

Palm Property Partners has a multi-channel ownership and visibility problem. Four agents receive approximately 260 buyer and seller inquiries, but inconsistent tracking creates both duplicate outreach and silent leads. The strongest business case is a unified intake layer that normalizes source data, identifies consumer intent, assigns ownership, and exposes the next required action without forcing agents to replace every tool at once.

Likely need

A brokerage-wide lead-routing and follow-up process connected to existing portal, email, and CRM sources.

Urgency

medium

Discovery questions

  • Which CRM and portal integrations are already licensed, and where does source attribution break today?
  • How should buyer, seller, investor, and rental inquiries be assigned across agents?
  • What service-level expectation should apply to new online leads versus referrals?
  • How are consent, unsubscribe requests, and agent takeover currently recorded?

Automation opportunities

  • Duplicate detection and one normalized record across web, portal, open-house, and referral sources
  • AI-assisted buyer-versus-seller intent and urgency classification
  • Territory, price-range, and availability-based agent assignment
  • Broker visibility into response time, next action, and conversion by source

Recommended next action

Review the proposed phased scope with the broker: begin with website and open-house leads, validate adoption for 30 days, then add paid portal sources.

AI-assisted recommendation · verify assumptions during discovery.

Automated prospect sequence

Consent-aware follow-up with stop safeguards

Permission

Email consent recorded

Sequences cannot start without a documented source of permission.

Stop conditions

Reply · booking · opt-out · closed

Each condition blocks future sends before delivery.

Internal notes

Robin requested an example showing how a seller inquiry and a buyer inquiry receive different questions while remaining in the same system.

Doug Cunningham · Aug 21, 10:53 AM

Proposal assumes four agent seats, two initial lead sources, one shared pipeline, and manager reporting. Portal API work is excluded until vendor access is confirmed.

Doug Cunningham · Aug 19, 10:53 PM